Please support the PCS campaign for fair pay in the public sector:

We the undersigned call for a change in the government's unjust public sector pay policy by removing the 2% pay cap. Instead we call for the government to offer pay deals that at least match inflation (retail price index) and ensure no cuts in living standards.

You can sign the petition online by following the link below:

http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/campaigns/national-pay-campaign/pay-petition.cfm

+++ MoD Pay Update +++

MoD Pay - Ongoing Discussions on Pay and E1/E2 Issues

PCS negotiators will meet the MoD pay team on Friday 23rd January 2009 for further discussions on the employer’s pay proposals for 2008-2011. We intend to start discussions on the following issues:

· Pay proposals for E1 and E2 max and the pay protection allowance
· Retained grades and market skills supplements (MSS)
· Agreed process for ongoing pay discussions
· Additional progression and the application of the payments
· Equal pay and age discrimination issues
· MoD admin costs budget
· 2009 Treasury Remit guidance (if possible)

A full report back on this meeting will be issued to PCS members shortly.

MoD proposals for the E1 and E2 Max

PCS totally opposes the current MoD proposals for staff in the E1 and E2 pay bands. We believe it would be completely unjust and unfair to penalise the lowest paid staff in the department by cutting their pay band maxima. It would be equally wrong to force thousands of hard working staff to accept non consolidated pay awards and also miss out on additional progression payments based on length of service.

Many PCS members have contacted us to make clear their anger at the proposals from the employer, and consultation with branches has revealed that this element specifically of the MoD proposal is totally unsatisfactory and that we cannot recommend acceptance of the award unless this issue is satisfactorily resolved.

Pay protection allowance

A number of members have contacted our union about the potential loss of pension entitlements if these proposals are enacted. In fact, the proposed pay protection allowance is fully pensionable. The allowance would top up the difference between an existing salary and the new max. Members would not to lose a penny in current pay or in current final salary pension payments.

Members are also asked to note that the max at both E1 and E2 does increase over the 3 years of the proposed deal and that this increase is fully consolidated and pensionable. We would expect the same arrangements to apply for future increases to the maxima at E1 and E2.

Finally we are fully aware that MoD has failed to provide a guarantee that the allowance will be paid for life (or at least until the max gets back to where it is now). We are also seeking further discussions on this issue and have made it clear that this issue must be must be resolved.

Legal considerations

PCS is already in consultation with our lawyers about the legality of the department’s proposals for staff at the E1 and E2 Max. As these proposals are not due to come into force until May 2009 we still have time to find an acceptable way forward with the department on this issue. However, should this not be possible we will set out that advice to members and publish guidance that would be applicable to all PCS members at pay band’s E1 and E2. Please check the MoD section of the PCS website (www.pcs.org.uk/mod) regularly for further updates on pay.

Current position and PCS bargaining agenda

It is worth restating that the proposals for the reduced maxima at pay band’s E1 and E2 have come from MoD and that PCS is fully opposed to this element of the pay award. We are dismayed that MoD would wish to attack the pay of some of the lowest paid staff in MoD.

Our union has therefore not accepted the MoD pay offer and we have agreed that further discussions between PCS and the department should take place on this and other key pay issues. When we believe we have exhausted the process we will ballot our members on the offer from the employer.

The forthcoming talks will focus on the recent national agreement on pay between PCS and the Cabinet Office/Treasury to see if this can result in further improvements to the offer. PCS will make clear that we must address the unacceptable proposals contained in the offer to reduce the E2 and E1 maxima and to pay impacted staff a small non-consolidated award.

The current proposals mean that some of the lowest paid staff will benefit less from this offer than other, comparatively better paid staff. This is unacceptable and our union will be doing all that we can to resolve this.

A further update on pay for PCS members will be issued shortly.

Sick Leave, Annual Leave and the Working Time Directive

The European Court of Justice today delivered its judgment in Stringer, Ainsworth and others v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, Case No. C-350/06, following the referral of questions to it from the House of Lords.

The case concerned how the right to paid annual leave under the Working Time Directive, 2003/88, implemented in the UK by the Working Time Regulations 1998, operates in the circumstances in which workers are on long-term sick leave. The Court was asked to decide two questions. The first was whether a worker on indefinite sick leave could exercise the right to take annual leave. The second was whether a worker who had been sick for all of a leave year was entitled to a payment in lieu for untaken annual leave on termination of employment.

Holding that the right to annual leave is a fundamental social right, on the first question the Court ruled that, under the Directive, national law could either permit a worker to take leave while he or she was off sick or could deny the entitlement to take leave while off sick. But it added – and this is the critical point - that if national law prevented a worker off sick from taking annual leave, the worker must have the opportunity to take that leave at another time (paragraph 29). Currently, under UK law there is no right to carry over annual leave to the following year (see regulation 13(9)), so that a worker off sick who is not allowed to take leave in a particular leave year will simply lose the right at the end of the leave year.

This means that, in order to comply with the Directive, employees on indefinite sick leave must be allowed to take annual leave while they are sick; otherwise the worker will never have the opportunity to exercise the right at all. Alternatively the government will need to amend the Regulations to permit the carrying over of annual leave for those employees who cannot take it because of sickness.

On the second question, concerning the right to a payment on termination, the Court said that the right to annual leave is not lost because a worker happens to be sick for the whole of the leave year prior to termination and so has not been able to exercise the right to annual leave. It follows that an allowance in lieu, based on normal wages, must be paid to such a worker on termination of employment. Employers must, therefore, pay the allowance in lieu under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations to workers off sick for the whole of the leave year, and must ignore sickness absence in the calculation of the sum due. The ruling of the European Court effectively overturns the decision of the Court of Appeal in the proceedings.

The case will return to the House of Lords probably later this year, both to consider the effect of the judgment of the European Court of Justice and to decide whether a complaint about unpaid annual leave can be brought as a claim for deduction from wages.

The workers in the case were members of the PCS whose claim was supported by the union. Chris Jeans Q.C and Michael Ford were instructed by Thompsons.

The link to the decision on the ECJ website is: http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=EN&Submit=Rechercher$docrequire=alldocs&numaff=C-350/06&datefs=&datefe=&nomusuel=&domaine=&mots=&resmax=100

++ STOP PRESS ++ MoD Pay Update ++

GEC view on pay offer

As you will be aware MoD has today published its pay offer to staff. The offer and an on line calculator is available on the MoD intranet and will also be available shortly via this part of the PCSwebsite: http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/ministry_of_defence_group/ministry_of_defence_group.cfm

Details of the offer

PCS members will note that the offer in many ways represents progress on key pay bargaining priorities for our union and members including:

Shorter pay scales – by 2010, there will be 5 scale points from min to max at E2 and E1; 6 at D – B2 and 7 at B1.
An end to overlapping pay scales between grades.
Significant growth of the pay band minima at E2 – D, with many staff at the bottom receiving an award of over 20%.
Additional pay progression, in 2009 and 2010, for staff with respectively over 8 years and 5 years service in their pay band, worth an additional 3%-6%.
Above inflation awards for many members in year 2 and 3 of the award in particular.
An end to higher starting pay (HSP) and functional recruitment and retention allowances (RRA), to be replaced by a market skills supplement (MSS) agreed with the trade unions.
The creation of a London pay scale and an uplift in London weighting.

There is no doubt that these concessions have been granted by MoD directly as a result of the action, including our legal action, taken by PCS members in MoD over the last few years and also as a result of the active support of members for our long running pay campaign.

However the offer also falls short of our aspirations in a number of areas, including:

The offer does not deliver an above inflation award for all members for each of the three years.
The offer contains proposals to reduce the pay band maxima at E2 and E1 and to introduce a ‘protected pay allowance’ for staff who find themselves at or above the new pay band maxima. We are not in agreement about the operation of the allowance at present.

The department has refused to commit to guaranteeing that progression through the new pay scales is automatic and have stated that progression can only be guaranteed until 2010.
Staff at their pay band maxima (or those who reach it during the period of the offer) will not benefit from the additional 3% progression payments.

The proposal to remove London pay from staff working overseas is totally unacceptable.
We believe that the progression arrangements are still too long in some cases

What happens next?

The department have informed us they intend to pay the first element of the offer (including back pay to August 2008) in February pay packets. Our union is aware that many members will welcome this initial payment. However this does not mean that the offer is being imposed on us or that the pay negotiations are complete.

In light of the PCS national campaign on pay – and following the agreement reached with the Cabinet Office and Treasury - MoD has agreed to continue negotiations with PCS on pay and on 4 key issues specifically. These are:

Further negotiations on MoD proposals for the E2 and E1 max (members will note that these proposals are not due to come into force until 1st May 2009) and therefore are not impacted by the February payment when staff migrate to the new 3% pay scale.
Talks on the 2009 Treasury remit guidance and possible benefits to PCS members.
Talks around the national agreement that PCS has recently secured with the Cabinet Office and Treasury on pay. Specifically, there will be talks to examine if money that MoD has saved through efficiency savings can be used to further improve the pay of PCS members in MoD.
There will be dialogue to assess if MoD and PCS can reach agreement on the equal pay and age discrimination cases that we have lodged at employment tribunal.

A timeline will be published for these talks shortly. If and when we reach an agreement PCS members will be balloted on a final offer from the department. We expect that an updated offer letter will be produced by MoD in due course if and when agreement is reached.

Yours sincerely

Paul Barnsley, group secretary
Chris Dando, group president
KC Jones, vice president

Agreement reached on PCS National Industrial action.

Message to members

PCS reaches agreement with government over pay

We have reached a national agreement with the government over pay. More money will now be released for pay bargaining in individual departments and related public bodies.

The government has also said that there is no 2% pay cap on staff pay increases.

We have been campaigning against the unfair pay limit on public sector pay increases and we have demanded fair pay for PCS members.

Many members have been in dispute with their management over the 2008 pay round.

In September members voted in a national ballot for a programme of industrial action. Strike action was planned for 10 November. We were then told by Sir Gus O’Donnell, head of the civil service, that talks could take place that would address our concerns in this national pay dispute.
Those talks have taken place and the agreement reached. A letter sent by Sir Gus O’Donnell to our general secretary which sets out the terms of the agreement is available on this website and from your local PCS rep.

More money to be made available for pay

The letter says that "efficiency savings" can be put to good use in improving pay. This policy change, involving cutting the use of consultants, for example, should release many millions of pounds. Management have not been able to use this money for pay previously. The letter also says that there is no 2% pay cap on staff pay increases so there is no necessity for people on the maximum of their pay scale to have zero increases.

Campaign continues

The agreement does not mean the end of our campaign for fair pay. It is now necessary for departmental PCS pay bargainers to go to management and talk to them about using this money for staff pay. Where there have been disputes, management must come back to the negotiating table. The agreement must be tested. There will not now be national industrial action organised under the authority of the September ballot. But our national campaign will not end until we are sure that members’ pay has been improved. If necessary, we will step the campaign up again. Members standing together, being prepared to take action, have opened the door to more money. Now we must make sure the agreement produces better pay for members.

Our other demands – on pay progression, regional pay, cutting the number of bargaining units, performance pay and equal pay – will be taken up in a process of discussions in the coming months.

Joint action with other unions

We have been working with other public sector unions to campaign against the pay cap. We have said that joint action is the best way to oppose an unfair government policy. But, in the absence of that joint action, and at a time of economic recession, the agreement we have reached is an important one. This is the first time in many years that we have achieved a national agreement on pay issues in the civil service and related areas.

Breakthrough

Since 2004 we have protected pensions, won agreements on avoiding compulsory redundancies and on privatisation, and stopped attacks on sick pay. Members should feel proud that we have now made this breakthrough on pay.

Mark Serwotka, General Secretary

Janice Godrich, President

Please see the text below on the PCS website.

http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/campaigns/national-pay-campaign/pay-campaign--members-briefing/ )

A Pay Update from MoD Group

Ministry of Defence

To: All Members
MoD GEC
MoD/MB/57/08

26th November 2008


Dear Colleagues,

MoD Pay - Update Number 5

Members may have seen the Civilian Pay Update that has recently been issued by MoD.

The text of this statement, which has been agreed with PCS, states "Informal pay talks with the Non Industrial Trade Unions continue. Management propose to put a formal offer to the unions very shortly with the aim of the pay award being in pay packets early next year. In parallel, talks are being held at national level following the suspension of the PCS civil service-wide action. The pay award will not be further delayed because of the national talks but any changes required to the award as a result of the national negotiations will be considered and if agreed put in place afterwards."

Members will wish to note that the PCS talks with the Treasury and the Cabinet Office are ongoing; we do not know yet whether an agreement is possible. A special meeting of the PCS national executive committee (NEC) had been planned for Thursday 27 November. This will now take place on Monday 1 December. This is to allow the talks to be completed.

Every effort is being made to progress the talks to a successful conclusion. But we do not yet know whether an agreement will be reached. Therefore, members must stand ready to take industrial action and retain strike and other campaign materials in case they are needed.

We must also continue to make our case for fair pay to employers, politicians and the public.

In MoD we have made clear to management that we will require a clause in the pay offer that re-opens the talks if there is something tangible from the national talks. We will however continue to talk to MoD management on pay and to make progress with the Department to ensure that the 2008 pay award is paid to PCS members as quickly as possible. There will be an emergency meeting of the PCS MoD group executive committee (GEC) as soon as we receive a formal offer and further information on this offer will be circulated to members as soon as possible.

A further update on pay will be issued to members next week.

Yours sincerely



Paul Barnsley
Group Secretary

National Action Suspended – Information for MoD Members

To: All Members (1:10) MoD/MB/55/08
cc: Group Executive Committee


Dear Colleagues,

National Action Suspended – Information for MoD Members

As you will be aware by now the NEC met on 7 November and decided to suspend the national strike planned for Monday 10 November and the overtime ban proposed to follow it. National officers will now enter into formal talks with the government.

The NEC made this decision because of the letter received from Sir Gus O’Donnell, Head of the Civil Service, which agreed that discussions should take place to address the concerns that form the basis of this national pay dispute and that the period during which the union could legally take industrial action would be extended by 28 days.

It is important that all MoD members realise that the programme of action which members voted for in the national ballot has not been cancelled: we have agreed not to take any action while talks are taking place to find a solution to the dispute. We have always said we would try and get a negotiated settlement if at all possible.

We would like to thank all members and reps who worked hard to prepare for the action on the 10 November and for your continuing support. In the MoD Group, the GEC set up a sub-committee that contacted all branches prior to the day of action to offer help and support. Had the action gone ahead, we know that we would have had a record number of picket lines at MoD sites with a record number of pickets on duty and attending the rallies up and down the country.

There is little doubt that senior MoD were aware of this and would have reported this back to the Cabinet office. We have absolutely no doubt that the strength of feeling shown in the MoD has been replicated across all groups and this will have heavily influenced Gus O’Donnell to write to our union agreeing that discussions should take place to address the concerns that form the basis of this dispute

By simply voting for and preparing to take action on 10 November, members in the MoD have now alongside all PCS members put in place a negotiating process that we hope will lead to an acceptable settlement. It remains to be seen whether enough progress will be made to form the basis of an acceptable settlement. If not, we must stand ready to take action.

In the build up to any industrial action there is always a higher than average rise in those who wish to join and those who wish to leave our union. This happened again in the lead up to November 10. We are delighted to say, however, that membership density in the MoD group has once again increased in the lead up to 10 November as it did prior to the days of action in 2007.

We welcome any new members to our union as the more members we have increases our bargaining power with the employer. You have joined the fastest growing union in the country and a union that is now consistently delivering for its members.

For those of you who have chosen to resign your membership, that of course is your democratic right and we respect that. However, we would ask that you reconsider. As stated above, the best possible chance we have of success is to have the highest possible membership density. The reality is that once again our intention to stand together in solidarity has caused the government to sit up and take notice.

Whatever the outcome of the talks, our union applied the pressure that brought them about. Every other avenue had been exhausted and as always the decision to move to action was a last resort but hopefully members who thought that industrial action or has happened on this occasion (as it happened when we protected our pensions), the threat of industrial action does not deliver will think again.

Nobody in the MoD group can afford to lose a day’s pay, but conversely and more importantly we believe nobody in the MoD group can afford to submissively accept below inflation pay offers that in reality are pay cuts for our already poorly paid members.

The ‘credit crunch’ we find ourselves in at present is not the fault of civil servants. The situation has been brought about by the banks that gambled with customer’s funds and have been bailed out of their mess with £500 billion of taxpayer’s money. £500 billion that the government apparently didn’t have! It will cost only £300 million to resolve the progression issue and bring every single servant into line with every other public sector worker.

We are not asking for special favours, we only want fairness. It is not unreasonable for our members – many of whom are among the lowest paid workers in the UK – to want to protect their living standards, particularly in these times of economic uncertainty. Our demands in the current national pay campaign are listed again below
· Consolidated basic pay increases at least equal to the retail price index
· Remove pay progression costs from budgets for increases
· Fewer separate pay negotiations
· Funding to remedy equal pay problems
· No link between pay and performance appraisal
· An end to pressure for regional pay
Finally, there may be cases where members did not attend work in the MOD on November 10 because it had not been possible to notify them that the strike was suspended. Where management are unsympathetic to such instances, please contact your local rep who will raise it up to the MOD group office so that the issue can be raised with the Cabinet Office.



Chris Dando
MoD Group President

Paul Barnsley
MoD Group Secretary

We will remember them...

Suspension of Industrial Action

Members have asked me to clarify the reason that the strike scheduled for today has been called off. Essentially, PCS asked the government to engage in constructive talks over pay in order to avoid strike action. At the eleventh hour, Sir Gus O'Donnell agreed to the unions demand and hence the strike is suspended pending talks for 28 days whilst talks can take place. The following has been circulated to all branchs and published on the PCS website (further information will be published as it comes available) .

The following message is on the PCS website:

PCS suspends national industrial action

The PCS national executive committee met this morning and following their receipt of a letter from Sir Gus O'Donnell, head of the home civil service, have decided to suspend the industrial action planned from Monday 10 November and the overtime ban proposed to commence on Tuesday 11 November.
Further information will be issued on Monday via the website.

The letter from the Head of the Civil Service follows

Mark Serwotka, general secretary
7 November 2008,
Mark,

Following the constructive discussions between yourselves and my officials, I am writing to confirm that I am prepared to agree, pursuant to Section 234(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, to a 28 day extension to the limitation of your current mandate for initiating industrial action. This will extend the period of validity to midnight on 11 December 2008, allowing your colleagues and officials to take forward discussions to address the concerns that form the basis of your current dispute.

Sir Gus O'Donnell, KCB
Secretary of the Cabinet and Head of the Home Civil Service

http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/ministry_of_defence_group/ministry_of_defence_group.cfm

Strike Action Suspended.

The planned strike for Monday 10th November 2008 has been suspended.

More information to follow.

A message from PCS General Secretary & President

Dear colleague,

We are writing to urge you to support the one day national strike on November 10.

It is always a hard decision to take industrial action, especially when money is tight. But PCS members would lose much more in the coming years unless we stand together now for fair pay.

We have been campaigning, alongside other unions, against an unfair government pay policy that caps pay deals below the level of inflation.

Importantly, we are also trying to end the double disadvantage for PCS members. For most of us, unlike the rest of the public sector such as Education and Health, progression up pay scales is funded from within annual pay settlement budgets. This makes the situation worse because there is even less money for basic pay. This unfairness must stop.

An agreement on these issues is achievable. Our demands can easily be afforded. Fair funding of progression would only cost approximately £300 million, about 2% of the total national paybill. That’s a drop in the ocean compared to the billions spent bailing out City bankers, the millions wasted on consultants, and the millions spent on five figure bonuses for the most senior civil servants.

We are making every effort to talk to Ministers and senior officials to find a solution to the dispute. The more united and determined we are on November 10, the greater the pressure on the employer to sit down with us and work out an agreement. The one day strike will be followed by a national overtime ban. If necessary our campaign will continue.

Since 2004 we have protected pensions, won agreements on avoiding compulsory redundancies and on privatisation, and stopped attacks on sick pay. By acting together we’ve shown campaigning works. We now need to stand together on pay.


Mark Serwotka General Secretary
Janice Goodrich President

Forty Acres: a poem for Barack Obama from Nobel winner Derek Walcott

Out of the turmoil emerges one emblem, an engraving —

a young Negro at dawn in straw hat and overalls,

an emblem of impossible prophecy, a crowd

dividing like the furrow which a mule has ploughed,

parting for their president: a field of snow-flecked

cotton forty acres wide, of crows with predictable omens

that the young ploughman ignores for his unforgotten

cotton-haired ancestors, while lined on one branch, is

a tense court of bespectacled owls and, on the field's

receding rim — a gesticulating scarecrow stamping with rage at him.

The small plough continues on this lined page

beyond the moaning ground, the lynching tree, the tornado's

black vengeance, and the young ploughman feels the change in his veins,

heart, muscles, tendons,

till the land lies open like a flag as dawn's sure

light streaks the field and furrows wait for the sower.

(As published today -

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5088429.ece)

Great News - Staff in MoD Receive a Pay Award in 2008!!!

Now for the bad news.... if you are one of the 1.496 staff in the MOD who got the rise, you did so because without this increase the MOD would have been paying less than the minimum wage and breaking the law.

In the meantime, after 6 years of imposed deals, which in the last two years have meant a real terms pay cut for half our staff, we are waiting yet again for negotiations to start on our pay increase.

At the same time we work alongside service personnel who have had their increment on their pay scale, their cost of living increase, and an increase in their X factor.

Not surprisingly therefore, with great reluctance, members have taken a democratic decision to go on strike on 10th November and I hope that you will all support this action. When you are in trouble you expect the union to be there for you. Well, it’s a two way pact. The union, or rather its members, are expecting you to be there, or rather away from work and not here, on November 10th.

Unfair, discriminatory, low pay systems are bad for us, bad for the MOD and bad for the country. We have waited long enough. Please support the action on November 10th. If you are not only prepared to be on strike but can help us on the picket line, then please let me know.

Ian Melvin

VA(NB)PCS Secretary

Ext 69081

Mod Pay 2008 Update from PCS MOD Group

To: All Members (1:10)

PCS Pay Update Number 3 – October 2008

Dear Colleagues

MOD PAY – DELAYED UNTIL 2009!!

The Department has confirmed that our pay award will not be paid until 2009!! The cat was let out of the bag in the MoD ’60 second digest’ where MoD stated that they have made “progress” meaning the pay award might be paid in “early” 2009. How this represents “progress” was not made clear.

The causes of the delay are clear – MoD incompetence and the disgraceful public sector pay restraint policy imposed by the Government. Hundreds of PCS members have already contacted their union to make clear their anger at this appalling news – and their determination to do something about it.

At a time of rising prices (inflation has hit 5.2%, while food, utility bills and fuel are increasing by over 10%) the stark reality is that many of us are struggling to make ends meet. Ministers and the senior mandarins responsible for this disgraceful delay should hang their heads in shame and offer to compensate members affected by the delay (but won’t).

The MoD role in delaying your pay
The MoD remains wedded to bureaucratic methods of putting together its business case on pay, without the resources to deliver. Our union has consistently warned that the department pay timetable was in reality a fiction and that timescales were slipping badly.

The Department has also dithered for far too long over the content of the business case – despite our union submitting our pay claim 6 months ago and making it clear what staff want from the 2008 pay award.

The Treasury role in delaying your pay
However, the bulk of the blame for the delay in our pay award should be laid at the door of the Treasury.

A key delaying factor has been the Government policy of limiting public sector pay increases to well below the rate of inflation. Gordon Brown intends to apply this policy for 2009 and 2010 too – and wants to force department to impose 3 year below inflation awards on all civil servants.

The Treasury insist on strictly monitoring all pay offers. In MoD they have insisted on agreeing the award with the Department in advance of any meetings with our union. They have instructed MoD that the pay award cannot be altered without their permission. The Treasury require any pay offer to be worth less than the rate of inflation, making nonsense of the concept of genuine negotiations between management and our union reps.

What is PCS doing about it?
We are making clear the anger of members at the highest levels of the Department and we continue to make this point at every opportunity.

PCS is seeking national solutions on pay, and meetings with the Cabinet Office, Treasury and Ministers are taking place. As you know we have sent ballot papers to all members on action over pay across the Civil Service and public sector organisations – we urge every member to vote to take action.

Finally, we have signalled to MoD management that our union will co-operate and do whatever necessary to expedite proceedings. What this could mean will be become clear over the next period, but we want every member to know that we will do whatever we can to get the final award into pay packets.

What can I do about it?
It is clear that MoD senior management have been stunned by the level of anger of our members at this unacceptable delay. We need to continue to make our voice heard. If Gordon Brown can find £500 Billion of our money to bail out the bankers and the City fat cats then he can afford to pay us fairly! Support the campaign:

1. Write to the Secretary of State John Hutton protesting about low pay and job security. His address and some helpful facts about MPs pay are available on our website www.pcs.org.uk (click on where you work and then MoD).
2. Vote yes in the Ballot on action on pay and attend any meetings called by your branch to update on our dispute
3. Support the forthcoming action called by our union – it’s time to say no to low pay and unfair pay across MoD. 20,000 staff earn less than an £8 per hour, and on 1 October 1,496 MoD staff woke up to find that they were once again earning the National Minimum Wage!
4. Talk to your friends and colleagues and ask them to join PCS – the more members we have, the stronger we become and the more MoD has to negotiate with us to achieve fair pay. Application forms are available on our website or from your local representative.
5. Get active – we need more distributors and people to help us win on pay and job security.

Yours sincerely


Paul Barnsley Group Secretary
Chrias dando Group President
K C Jones Vice President

Black Hawk Down

If you’ll permit me I need to preface this piece with a few remarks and riders.

Firstly I make no apologies for taking time here to pay my regards to two American servicemen. We have many heroes of our own I know, I have been lucky enough to meet one or two during the course of my career. As time goes by I will pay homage, in the magazine and on the blog, to as many of them as I can, and as their ‘anniversaries’ come up.

Whatever your views about these two servicemen, and US foreign policy you’ll notice that however badly a military operation is conceived and planned, and however dubious you may feel the intent is, the outcomes are so often the same. Ordinary men and women, doing the duty, looking after their comrades and so often dying doing it.

In 1992 the United Nations supported by U.S. armed forces had arrived in Somalia in a joint operation known as Operation Restore Hope. The intention was to restore order in a country destroyed by civil war and brought to its knees by famine. Despite an initial agreement of a ceasefire 24 Pakistani UN troops were killed in an ambush in an area controlled by Mohamed Farrah Aidid. The UN Security Council called for the arrest and trial of those responsible, issuing resolution 837. Then in July 1993 a 20 minute US helicopter attack killed 73 Clan elders and not the militia who were the intended target. So by the time of Operation Gothic Serpent (of which The Battle of Mogadishu was part) Mogadishu was at boiling point and US popularity at an all time low. Six months and 48000 tons of food and medical aid had not helped the situation, half a million Somalis were dead and three times that number displaced, and it was felt that drastic action was needed.

The plan for this stage of Operation Gothic Serpent was simple enough, fly in, arrest key members of the warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid’s regime and get out in a road convoy. As we know, it went horribly wrong, leaving 18 American servicemen dead and 73 wounded, whilst casualties amongst the Somalis were hard to estimate. Combined figures for civilians and armed militia range from around 1000-3000 dead to twice or even three times that number wounded. These figures themselves have brought questions about a lack of restraint by US forces, on the other hand the killing of the UN troops, and alleged abuses of the bodies of the dead and wounded were fresh in the mind. Whilst the US forces were better armed and extremely well trained, the Somali militia in the area numbered in the thousands.

Everybody has an opinion about this and it is not my intention the challenge any of those. Nor is it my intention to make any judgements as to the rights and wrongs of the operation. All I can do is offer my sympathies to the families of all of those that died in Mogadishu.


Randall Shughart and Gary Gordon

The real purpose of this piece is to pay tribute to two extraordinarily brave men.

Sergeant First Class Randal Shughart and Master Sergeant Gary Gordon both lost their lives on October 3rd 1993 protecting the lives of the crew of Black Hawk helicopter Super Six Four commanded by Mike Durant.
Super Six Four had been shot down by a rocket propelled grenade, Shughart and Gordon were in another Black Hawk, Super Six Two commanded by Mike Goffena, which had taken up a holding pattern above the crash site.

From this position Shughart and Gordon were providing suppressive fire and sniper cover. It soon became clear that despite the fact that militia men in their hundreds were converging on the crash site no ground rescue was imminent. Shughart and Gordon repeatedly requested permission to be dropped near Six Four’s crash site in order to provide protection from the ground. The first two requests were rejected but finally granted on the third request, the pilot of Blackhawk Super 62, Mike Goffena set them down about 100 metres from the crash site. From there they fought their way past shacks and through narrow passage ways, under constant fire and with the numbers of militia growing steadily.

The accounts of exactly was happened next vary from teller to teller but they all agree that Randy Shughart and Gary Gordon showed uncommon bravery and devotion as they tried to protect the pilot and crew of Super Six Four. In a fire fight that followed Randy Shughart and Gary Gordon patrolled the perimeter of the crash site repelling hundreds of armed gunmen, and putting themselves in grave danger.

Make no mistake here, whilst many of the hundreds of armed Somalis converging on the crash site were effectively untrained civilians they were, mostly, well armed with automatic weapons and not short of shooting experience. And amongst their number were well organised bands of local militia. Additionally many were furiously angry over the death of their clan leaders and with what they saw as an occupying force. Shughart and Gordon could have opted to stay in the Black Hawk and used it’s Miniguns to indiscriminately spray the entire area with bullets, but they didn’t.

Finally Gary was killed. It is not absolutely clear which man died first, and I don’t suppose it matters much now, but to continue this version of events, following Gary’s death Randy returned to Mike Durant, now the only survivor of Super Six Four, giving him Gary’s weapon before returning to patrol the area. Very shortly afterwards, his ammunition depleted, Randy was shot and fatally wounded.

Having attacked the bodies of the fallen with knives, machetes, stones and various other weapons the militia descended upon pilot Mike Durant, fiercely beating him before being told to stop by a local militia leader, arriving at the scene, who claimed him as a prisoner.

The time that Randy Shughart and Gary Gordon had bought Mike Durant had saved his life. No one will ever know exactly what went through their minds when they volunteered to protect Super Six Four from the ground. But they were above the area at the time and could clearly see the numbers of armed persons that they would be facing and that were converging on the crash site from every angle. Whilst you couldn’t say the action was a forlorn hope it was certainly close to one. They must have known that their chances if survival were small. But they didn’t hesitate to step in.

In recognition of the extreme heroism and devotion to duty Randy Shughart and Gary Gordon were posthumously awarded the US’ highest award, the Medal of Honor.

Please take a moment to read the citations on the official web site here;

http://www.medalofhonor.com/Somalia.htm

Of the two men the surviving pilot Mike Durant said -

"Without a doubt, I owe my life to these two men and their bravery.” “Those guys came in when they had to know it was a losing battle," "There was nobody else left to back them up. If they had not come in, I wouldn't have survived.”


The true way to mourn the dead is to take care of the living who belong to them.
- Edmund Burke

National Pay Ballot - Letter responding to Gus & Bill

26 September 2008

To: All Members (1:10) MoD/MB/41/08
cc: Group Executive Committee


Dear Colleagues,

National pay ballot – Letters from PUS and Cabinet Office Secretary

Many members will have been sickened (but unfortunately not surprised) to have received letters from our Permanent under Secretary, Sir Bill Jeffrey and the Cabinet Office Secretary, Sir Gus O’Donnell regarding the current PCS national pay ballot. Although they fall short of asking members not to support our union’s call for action, they also fall short of offering any solution to the problems we face.

Sir Bill and Sir Gus both have warm words about the contribution and value of civil servants to defence. Unfortunately, though no doubt genuinely meant, these offer little comfort to members struggling to make ends meet and often working two or three jobs to provide for their family.

Our leaders fail to understand that pay offers which fail to keep pace with inflation, let alone basic food and utility bills, do not indicate to staff that they are valued. And our pay claim is hardly demanding film star wages, or even film extra wages!

Sir Bill recognises that our pay implementation date is now long gone, but fails to recognise that delaying any award until 2009 will have serious consequences for staff who face rising bills and hard choices now.

Sir Gus believes that civil servants continue to enjoy terms and conditions which provide a substantial level of security both in work and retirement. He forgets to add that these were only secured and defended by concerted action from the trade unions and that further threats to both job security and pensions are on the horizon.
The streamlining and PACE proposals will see a further 10,000 jobs lost within the MOD over the next three years (on top of 13,000 lost in the last three years), with the Public Value Programme to be announced in November threatening thousands more. Meanwhile Sir Gus’s own Cabinet Office proposes ending the current civil service redundancy scheme to save money!

Both Sir Bill and Sir Gus believe that now is not the right time to take industrial action, with negotiations about to commence. However both know that the hands of their negotiators are tied by the Treasury, who will not allow the MOD to offer any pay increase that exceeds their 2% pay cap.

However, we recognise that calling for industrial action is a last resort. We have been campaigning and lobbying for fair pay. We want a negotiated settlement, as we understand the consequences of taking action on support to the front line. But talks, which have been ongoing since February, have so far not produced a positive response.

In his speech to the Labour party conference, Gordon Brown said his job would be worthwhile if it helped one person, one family or one community. He now has an opportunity to put these fine words into practice.

The government must recognise the damage that their unfair pay cap is causing to millions of hard working public servants, their families and their communities. Having found the money to bail out reckless financial institutions and city speculators, he must now relax his unfair rules on civil service pay to avoid an industrial dispute that no-one wants.

Unlike Sir Bill and Sir Gus, we believe that members understand that by negotiating, campaigning and taking action only where necessary we have defended our pensions, our sick pay arrangements and our job security. Now we need to do the same on pay, by voting YES in the ballot.

Chris Dando MoD group president

Dougie Brownlie MoD communications officer

Minister Blames Troops for JPA Failures!

Some while ago I wrote to Joan Humble MP to ask if the Government will be applying Service Level Failure charges against Electronic Data Systems (EDS) in connection with the Joint Personnel Administration (JPA) system. Joan forwarded the question to the Minister and I received a reply from Rt Hon Bob Ainsworth MP (as Duty Minister).

Bob tells me that "MOD investigates every Service Level Failure and judges whether EDS are in part or wholly responsible. If EDS is partly or wholly responsible, the Service Pensions and Veterans Agency applies all the available contract options to ensure the MOD achieves the appropriate recompense."

Unfortunately he goes on to say that, "MOD's contracts with EDS do not carry financial penalties," which seems bizarre in the least but, "they do contain provisions linking payment to performance in order to ensure value for money." However, and despite this, "disclosure of whether or not MOD has exercised its contractual rights under these provisions could prejudice the MOD's on-going commercial relationship with its contractors."

So, what he is saying is that whilst there have been service failures, and there are provisions in the contracts to deal with these, he isn't going to say so or enforce the contract because it might upset our suppliers? Astonishing, but wait, who does the Minister think is to blame for the failures? Well, Bob puts the blame squarely on our troops as he says, "when failures in service delivery relating to pay or allowances do occur, there can be a variety of causes including incorrect or late inputs to the JPA system by individuals and/or their support staff. However, as personnel become more familiar with the system, we expect problems to decrease."

PCS Pay Petition

http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/campaigns/pay-campaign/pay-petition.cfm

Farewell Richard Wright

So the world said goodbye to Richard Wright who died yesterday at the age of 65 following a short struggle with cancer.

Rather than comment myself I will simply quote David Gilmour, from his website (http://www.davidgilmour.com/index.htm), as I think you will agree he has said it all.

In the welter of arguments about who or what was Pink Floyd, Rick's enormous input was frequently forgotten.He was gentle, unassuming and private but his soulful voice and playing were vital, magical components of our most recognised Pink Floyd sound.

I have never played with anyone quite like him. The blend of his and my voices and our musical telepathy reached their first major flowering in 1971 on 'Echoes'. In my view all the greatest PF moments are the ones where he is in full flow. After all, without 'Us and Them' and 'The Great Gig In The Sky', both of which he wrote, what would 'The Dark Side Of The Moon' have been? Without his quiet touch the Album 'Wish You Were Here' would not quite have worked.In our middle years, for many reasons he lost his way for a while, but in the early Nineties, with 'The Division Bell', his vitality, spark and humour returned to him and then the audience reaction to his appearances on my tour in 2006 was hugely uplifting and it's a mark of his modesty that those standing ovations came as a huge surprise to him, (though not to the rest of us).Like Rick, I don't find it easy to express my feelings in words, but I loved him and will miss him enormously.

David GilmourMonday 15th September 2008

Mod Pay 2008 Update & National Pay Campaign

PCS Mod Pay Update & National Pay Campaign Meeting – Wednesday 24th Sept. 10:30, Room 6201A Tomlinson House.

Members are advised that PCS are holding a meeting to discuss Mod Pay 2008 and the National Pay Campaign in the conference room, 6201A at 10:30 on Wednesday 24th September 2008. Facility time of one hour has been allowed by management for all members to attend this meeting.

Dougie Brownlie from Mod Group will be on hand to give members the latest update on pay 2008 and will detail the national pay campaign.

The PCS national pay campaign is critical. PCS are calling for:

A cost of living award in line with inflation
Reform of the Treasury Remit Guidance so that progression is funded in the same way as the rest of the public sector i.e. outside of the pay cap.

This is because the inadequacy of MoD pay directly arises from Government policy of limiting public sector pay increases to well below the rate of inflation. This pay restraint policy also applies for 2009 and 2010. The Treasury are strictly monitoring all pay offers, agreeing the award with Departments in advance of any meetings with the unions, and are insisting that they cannot be altered without their permission.

The Treasury require any pay offer to be worth less than the rate of inflation, making nonsense of the concept of genuine negotiations between management and unions.

This approach punishes all of the public sector, but in fact is particularly bad for the Civil Service and related bodies. In our case the overall increase allowed by the Treasury includes the cost of funding pay progression, whilst for the rest of the public sector pay progression is resourced from outside the pay cap. This is inherently unfair and reform of the Treasury Remit Guidance is at the heart of the national campaign.

I hope to see many of you there.
Yours fraternally
Ian Melvin
VA(NB)PCS Secretary